Skip to content
Home » A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world



ब्रिलियंट की प्रीमियम सदस्यता पर 20% की छूट पाएं – जीवन भर के लिए! 1989 में इस घोषणा के साथ कोल्ड फ्यूज़न विस्फोट के दृश्य पर साइन अप करें कि शोधकर्ताओं फ्लेशमैन और पोंस ने एक रासायनिक प्रक्रिया के माध्यम से ऊर्जा बनाई थी जो कमरे के तापमान पर संलयन को प्रेरित करती है। जब कोई और अपने निष्कर्षों को दोहराने में सक्षम नहीं था, तो शीत संलयन दशकों में सबसे बड़ी विज्ञान विफलताओं में से एक के रूप में नीचे चला गया। लेकिन कुछ का मानना ​​है कि वे सही रास्ते पर थे, और उनका तरीका दुनिया को बदलने की कुंजी हो सकता है। लेख और वीडियो के लिंक नीचे दिए गए हैं। पैट्रन पर मेरा समर्थन करें! टेस्ला पाने के इच्छुक हैं तो कूल नीरी टी-शर्ट प्राप्त करें? मेरे रेफ़रल लिंक का उपयोग करें और छूट और लाभ प्राप्त करें: एक चैनल सदस्य बनें और यहां विशेष लाइवस्ट्रीम और सामग्री तक पहुंच प्राप्त करें: मेरे सभी स्थानों पर मेरा अनुसरण करें! इंस्टाग्राम: स्नैपचैट: फेसबुक: ट्विटर: लिंक लिंक: मिनटफिजिक्स – मुऑन-कैटालिज्ड फ्यूजन एनिमेशन का उत्कृष्ट ब्रेकडाउन जाली-सक्षम कोल्ड फ्यूजन विधि दिखा रहा है: एक प्रो-एलईएनआर वीडियो: एलईएनआर शोध अध्ययनों का एक संग्रह:।

See also  Function in c programming | add two numbers using function in c | function programs in c c programming technology channel

Table of Contents

See also  Captain AI technology background technology background

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
पैसे कमाने के और तरीके देखें: यहाँ और देखें
पैसे कमाने के और तरीके देखें: यहाँ और देखें

49 thoughts on “A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world”

  1. Imagine trying to explain something like GPS (which depends on the speed of light) to someone who thought Newton's Laws were "the final answer".

    What it comes down to is "have you done the work?" If somebody comes to you with this really cool theory/idea AND can show you how they got there, all power to them.

    It's really hard for me to declare that cold fusion is impossible with particles apparently going back and forth in time… but I'd want to see the chain of events leading up such an extraordinary claim.

  2. NASA won't touch emdrive no matter how promising it could be they're too regimented to take actual scientific risks anymore. Maybe it's a pipe dream but it's something that can only be tested in space. I think if someone with their very own private space fleet were to launch a study into and it played out…forget about going to see little green men or settling colonies – there's still too much other work that needs to be done like some way to mimic gravity. If the emdrive was tested and it worked and was perfected; whatever company did that would own energy and be the ONLY name in clean energy from that point on. If you have an engine that takes no power but generates movement then you have a way to spin a dynamo and beam that energy via laser or microwave back to Earth for use.

  3. I can see one exception to your thinking ways. There are people that although they might not realize it, it is their jobs to force themselves to think differently. Scientists themselves or at leat those who do something big, usually start from not accepting things as is.
    But in general, I agree with you. I can have the luxury of doubting everything around my own speciality, but I trust the rest to what majority of scientists can agree on them. Which Btw, at best 30% somewhat accurate and in time most of them will be discredited or replaced with a new version that many time is an improved version of the old views. I don't see a way to do better than this while one keeps studying and thinking and growing that might lead to some wisdom seeing things a bit better starting seeing things. And get back to the right side of the DK graph in a different level! 🤔

  4. What most people don't know is that a Cold Fusion machine was invented, but it was stolen by the infamous PAYDAY gang for a certain right-leaning senator backed by a large oil conglomerate.

  5. I think skepticism can lead to cynicism and that's what we need to avoid. But as long as your skepticism is applied appropriately so that it doesn't squash creativity and thinking out of the box- it's a good thing I think. The w ay I look at it there's no way you can study it all- at some point if you're going to be educated and informed you have to take someone's word for it. At least when it comes to science I know and understand the means by which they arrived at their opinions- the scientific method. In reality I'm trusting that method- not them or their authority. This is why I feel it's super important that we hold these ppl accountable to following that method always- never deviating or letting bias skew the outcome any more than what's absolutely unavoidable. This means policing the way papers are published, the way labs operate, how experiments are carried out, etc. Because like any other institution science is not immune to the almighty influence of the dollar.

  6. I wish you would have talked more about the lack of neutrons and the lack of other evidence that fusion took place. And yes I believe that this should be pursued. The fact that it works so well with muons means that the amount of energy required is in the same magnitude as that required. It may be possible to modify the substrate to get better results.

  7. Well, it was brilliant – the original concept. It was revolutionary for sure. And maybe, just maybe, there's an international conspiracy to keep the lid on it. I mean would you accept from me right now $75,000 to take this video down and replace it with a lizard aliens video? Oh – you already did that? Well – okay, then!

  8. well, another great work by Joe! thanks very much!
    I'm not a physicist of any kind, but from what I can remember from my physical metallurgy course years back, diffusing so many deuterium atoms into the Pd crystal would be next to impossible. You can think about it as a dissolution problem, it's fairly easy to dissolve the first spoon of sugar into your coffee but can you dissolve 10000 spoons in the same cup? maybe extreme conditions like RF currents would work, but the energy put into making it happen would exceed the output as with other methods as Joe mentioned. Now, I'm not a physicist as mentioned earlier, but as a researcher of nanomaterials, I wonder if they have been looking into the possibility of utilizing the more open surface lattice structure of nanostructured Pd… although I kind of feel like it would increase the chances of getting the spikes, but the repeatability and energy economy would indeed remain problematic.
    Let's use SOLAR folks! artificial photosynthesis is a thing! we just have to make it feasible…

  9. The real technology that will change the world is a new exchange model. To me, that is a no-cost currency. Not usury, not demurrage, no-cost. Completely free to use. Its value is based on the work of people choosing to be paid in it. My model, called BUXB, also pays for people to be educated, community and civil projects/infrastructure, and running of the bank. This allows the bank to be owned by the people. it also takes out any commodity of money, that meaning making money on money. Feel free to find out more by searching BUXXB. Happy to answer any questions through Facebook.

  10. The first time all the hype about cold fusion broke was over 30 years ago. That's when the 2 chemist went public claiming the breakthrough. After that long time with no further progress, it's had not to be skeptical.

  11. The private sector regarding science and related discoveries will never be allowed to patent or integrate new technologies. Anything that would interfere w fossil fuel production has been silenced.

  12. I thought learning new things that are coming up but I picked archiologist and therology philosophy. Let me say these people are visious to each other. They have went so far as to hide USA giants living among or prior to the native American Indian. Who referred to them as ant people give they say it was hard to say Atlantaians. So they seriously high jacked our history.. I mean thousands upon throusands of them and a naturally large pututary glands. No tumors no giant diease..

  13. "A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists)." Soooooo, the most obvious declaration in the history of humans, then, I guess? Ok, cool. Cool Cool Cool.

    I mean, you could totally make something up off the top of your head and that statement would still apply.

  14. I live right by 3 mile island, is there anything this Joe Scott guy doesn't know about? I guess it's well known, especially for people interested in nuclear energy history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.